I spent the last couple of days musically editing the first movement (I know I said that I wouldn’t, but I did. So there.). It’s thirty seconds longer, and I fixed some parts that I didn’t like. It also has a much more subtle ending, which should prepare the listener for the second movement a little better. Tell me if you like it more than the first ending. MIDI|MP3
Recent Comments
- Anonymous on Polyamory and Respect
- H2s on Polyamory and Respect
- Luke on Polyamory and Respect
- akos on Polyamory and Respect
- wren ng thornton on Polyamory and Respect
- Great layman's article on bounded gaps and twin primes: slate.com/articles/healt… 5 hours ago
Tags
abstraction
algorithms
argument
before i forget
beliefs
category-theory
code
codecatalog
compositions
constructive logic
creativity
dana
dependency injection
distractions
experimental writing
family
frp
games
glop
greatness
haskell
ixi
language
love
math
meditation
music
paradigms
perl
perl6
personal
philosophy
physics
poker
polyamory
probability
realism
relativism
thought
work
writing
zen
Archives
- May 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (3)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (5)
- November 2008 (8)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (6)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (10)
- April 2008 (9)
- March 2008 (5)
- February 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (8)
- November 2007 (11)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (11)
- June 2007 (12)
- May 2007 (11)
- April 2007 (6)
- March 2007 (7)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (11)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (11)
- October 2006 (17)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (28)
- July 2006 (19)
- June 2006 (26)
- May 2006 (7)
- April 2006 (8)
- March 2006 (4)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (6)
- December 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (6)
- July 2005 (6)
- June 2005 (2)
- May 2005 (9)
- April 2005 (10)
- March 2005 (8)
- February 2005 (6)
- January 2005 (4)
- December 2004 (5)
- November 2004 (11)
- October 2004 (3)
- September 2004 (10)
- August 2004 (7)
- July 2004 (11)
- June 2004 (7)
- May 2004 (12)
- April 2004 (8)
- March 2004 (8)
- February 2004 (13)
- January 2004 (7)
- December 2003 (17)
- November 2003 (17)
- October 2003 (9)
Top Posts
- Polyamory and Respect
- Enumerating a context-free language
- Making Haskell nicer for game programming
- Haskell Antipattern: Existential Typeclass
- How to shrink a git repository
- Follow Your Nose Proofs
- What's a natural transformation?
- Constructions on Typeclasses, Part 1: F-Algebras
- Programs are made of ideas
- Computing without a middle

This is a composition analysis, written by Nguyen Thu Trieu to Luke Palmer for his great and
proud work. And an icon I have designed for him.
(analyze in minutes)
00:46 -> 01:16 : This section is a run on the piano that presents he is both romanticist and drasticist.
01:35 -> 01:39 : Impressionist’s tune.
01:40 -> 01:45 : Awesome part: The similar techniques can only be found in Beethoven’s sonatas
03:58 -> 04:15 : This is impressionist’s tune, he had used such techniques in an attractive way.
(The silent before the storm)
04:15 -> 04:27 : The strong winds came.
04:28 -> 04:46 : Drasticism -> incorparation of both Liszt and Chopin’s esoteric skills to describe
as the storm.
05:34 -> 05:45 : Multi-texture, (light and flowing) -> The current composers (including me, even I
proclaimed myself a multi-skill composer) are very difficult to write something
similar to this one. This part leaves far behind such composer like me, Yanni
or Paul De Senneville.
08-10 -> 08:27 : Impressionist tune again. This can be found in Debussy piece (just similar technique,
not similar melody)
08:28 -> 08:80 : The expansion of the begining run. (His own skill, look at A:18 Sonata dedicated to Karlin
which has similar flows)
Complement:
“So, if Beethoven’s sonatas can not satisfy your ear, Luke Palmer is one solution.”
Nguyen Thu Trieu.
Criticism:
Iteration had been made by the softly ending part from minutes 07:08 to 08:27 even the melody was
expanded and changed. Anyway, iteration is still not bad. And at minute 04:17 to 04:23, I would suggest
you to keep the original one, we should not run fast here because it results failure in emphasis on the coming
part.
I also proposed Laura for making program to vote and rank. Then, pretty pieces will remain forever in the gold-list. Try it out!
The icon can be downloaded at http://trieu.babylonia.flatirons.org/image/lukepalmer.gif
I am plagiarising the concerto now, I have never made a success, though.
Should the orchestra accompany the piano from 6:51 to 7:04 of the 1_r06_complete_edit_2 ?
What’s up?
Produce something more, Luke. (ie. the no. 2 or a symphony…)